FREE WILL IS FOR THOSE WHO VALUE IT

Edward Bernays, often called the "father of public relations," was a master of psychological manipulation through media. His tactics were rooted in crowd psychology, Freudian psychoanalysis (he was Freud’s nephew), and an unshakable belief that the masses needed to be guided by an informed elite. Let’s break down his core tactics and compare them to the current landscape:

1. Emotional Appeal Over Logic:
    
   • He bypassed rational thought and targeted the subconscious. For example, to promote cigarettes to women, he branded them as "Torches of Freedom," linking smoking with female empowerment.
      

1. Use of Experts and Front Groups:
    
   • He created or used the appearance of credible third parties. He would hire doctors to say bacon and eggs was the best breakfast, then publish it as news.
      

1. Media Saturation & Repetition:
    
   • He planted the same message across newspapers, radio, speeches, and events to create a sense of consensus and inevitability.
      

1. Symbols and Visual Spectacle:
    
   • Bernays used imagery to tap into deeper psychological desires—like linking products to patriotism, freedom, or sexual appeal.
      

1. Create Events, Don’t Just Advertise:
    
   • He orchestrated newsworthy events. For example, organizing a parade where debutantes lit up Lucky Strikes—an act staged entirely for press coverage.
      

1. Engineering Consent:
    
   • He believed democracy required the manipulation of public opinion to ensure societal stability and control.
      

TacticBernays’ Era (1920s–1950s)TodayMedia ChannelsNewspapers, radio, filmSocial media, influencers, algorithmic feeds, 24/7 newsEmotional TargetingPrimitive psychology, Freud-basedAdvanced behavioral data, AI-driven psychographics (e.g., Cambridge Analytica)Third-Party ValidationDoctors, staged research groups“Fact-checkers,” influencers, NGO “studies,” even fake botsRepetition StrategyControlled press cyclesReal-time memes, viral trends, algorithmic amplificationSpectacleParades, news stuntsHashtag movements, viral videos, staged "grassroots" activism (astroturfing)Consent EngineeringOne-way persuasionInteractive manipulation (likes, shares, echo chambers, rage clicks)  

• Speed & Scale:
  Bernays had to wait for press cycles. Today, one viral post can manipulate millions in hours.
   
• Data Granularity:
  Bernays generalized about “the crowd.” Today’s institutions target you—personally—with ads based on your Google searches, heart rate (via wearable tech), or dopamine triggers.
   
• Decentralized Manipulation:
  Bernays worked top-down. Today’s landscape has multiple players—governments, corporations, influencers—all simultaneously shaping narratives, sometimes unknowingly.
   
• Perceived Authenticity:
  Bernays used staged authority. Now, manipulation often wears the mask of authenticity—user reviews, “relatable” content creators, or grassroots-style movements that are secretly funded.
   

Bernays cracked the code for manipulating masses through symbols and emotional appeal. Modern society took his playbook, digitized it, and strapped it to a neural net. We're no longer passively persuaded—we're immersed in a tailored reality designed to guide our decisions while making us believe we arrived at them independently.

If you want, I can give you examples of current tactics (like how a brand sells identity instead of product) or how governments use this in political messaging.

Then (Bernays):

• Marketed cigarettes to women as a symbol of liberation ("Torches of Freedom").
   

Now:

• Slogans like "Trust the Science" in COVID messaging often bypassed nuance and dissenting expert opinions.
   
• "Defund the Police" used emotional footage of police brutality to rally support, while downplaying the complex social consequences.
   

✅ Effect: Bypasses reason, hijacks emotion, and reframes policy debates into moral imperatives.

Then:

• Bernays hired doctors to say bacon was healthy or dentists to say people should eat more sugarless gum.
   

Now:

• Fact-checking organizations (like PolitiFact or Snopes), often portrayed as neutral, are funded by political or ideological actors.
   
• Health experts with media airtime were often cherry-picked during COVID to align with messaging.
   

✅ Effect: Creates illusion of consensus. Dismisses dissent as misinformation even when scientifically valid.

Then:

• Plant stories across radio, newspapers, and newsreels until it became common knowledge.
   

Now:

• Every mainstream outlet repeats the same phrases:
   "Threat to our democracy"
  "Baseless claims"
  "Insurrection"
  "Misinformation"
  
   
• Repetition of trigger terms to implant associative fear or virtue (e.g., “climate crisis,” “systemic racism”).
   

✅ Effect: Repetition solidifies perception. Questioning becomes taboo or dangerous.

Then:

• Organized visually striking stunts (e.g., women smoking in parades).
   

Now:

• Rainbow flags at embassies, kneeling in kente cloth, or Biden’s “Soul of the Nation” speech lit in red like a dystopian set—intended to project strong symbolic narratives.
   

✅ Effect: Uses visuals to cue emotion, bypass analysis, and signal loyalty/virtue.

Then:

• Staged parades and press stunts to manufacture public opinion.
   

Now:

• Scripted town halls, activist-organized school walkouts, or highly produced "spontaneous protests" often get coordinated media coverage before they even happen.
   
• For example, the Women’s March after Trump’s election was a pre-planned media event with corporate sponsors and viral distribution, not a raw public outcry.
   

✅ Effect: Media frames events before public forms its own opinion.

Then:

• Use controlled media to tell the public what to think is “normal” or “necessary.”
   

Now:

• Big Tech partners with government (e.g., Twitter Files revelations) to suppress dissenting views under the guise of safety or misinformation.
   
• Phrases like "Our democracy is at stake" engineer consent for censorship, investigations, or emergency powers.
   

✅ Effect: Reduces the Overton window (range of acceptable thought), and ensures “public” support for top-down policy.

Bernays loved redefining terms to associate positive/negative feelings.

Now:

• Words like “woman,” “vaccine,” “patriot,” or even “recession” have been redefined or softened to fit political narratives.
   
• Loaded terms like “anti-vaxxer,” “climate denier,” “election denier” equate political disagreement with dangerous extremism.
   

✅ Effect: Framing dissent as moral failure or conspiracy.

Bernays TacticModern Example (Democrats/Media)Emotion over logic"If it saves one life," "kids in cages," "Hands up, don't shoot"Experts as toolsFauci as a media icon; funded “fact-checkers”Repetition“Threat to democracy,” “January 6,” “systemic racism”SymbolismMasks as virtue signals, BLM murals, Ukrainian flags in biosMedia EventsStaged town halls, symbolic protest coverageConsent engineering"You’ll own nothing and be happy," social media bans 

Our healthcare technologies can help you provide better care to your patients. From wearable devices to telemedicine platforms, we can help you leverage the latest innovations to improve patient outcomes.

Our energy solutions can help you reduce your carbon footprint and save money on your energy bills. From solar panels to smart grid systems, we can help you harness the power of renewable energy.

Our education technologies can help you deliver more engaging and effective learning experiences. From virtual reality simulations to personalized learning platforms, we can help you transform education for the 21st century.